A Runware alternative: Revana and Runware prices, model by model

The short answer

Revana is cheaper than Runware for Seedance 2.5 at 1080p, Seedance 2.0 Fast and Mini, Veo 3.1 Fast, Wan 3.0, Wan 2.6, Grok Imagine Video, PixVerse V6, Nano Banana Pro, Seedream 5.0 Pro and Ideogram V3, and does not charge for failed or refused jobs. The tables below list only the settings where Revana's price is lower.

• Seedance 2.5 at 1080p: Revana sells it at $0.55 a second, 10% below Runware's $0.6085.
• Veo 3.1 Fast: $0.11 a second at 1080p with sound on Revana, 27% below Runware's $0.15.
• Nano Banana Pro: Revana charges $0.04 an image at 1K, 2K and 4K, 71% below Runware's $0.138 at 2K and 84% below its $0.244 at 4K.
• Grok Imagine Video 1.5: $0.07 a second at 720p on Revana, 50% below Runware's $0.14.
• Failed jobs, one key, agents: on Revana the price is held at submit and released if the job fails or the model refuses the prompt. One key covers every model, there is an MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and Codex, and the balance is prepaid from $10 with no subscription.

Video models: Revana and Runware per second

Prices per second of output, from each model's page on Runware and Revana's pricing page, checked on 28 October 2026. Runware prices Seedance 2.5 by tokens; that is converted to a price per second of 16:9 video at 24 frames a second. Prices Runware sets per clip are divided by the clip length. Settings where Revana is not lower are left out.

Image models: Revana and Runware per image

Per output image, before any input image or token charges:

What a batch costs

The same batches priced on each, both ways round:

Which one fits

Runware also hosts many open image models and custom model uploads, which Revana does not. For a model that is not in the tables above, compare the two price lists before you move it. Revana fits best when your spend is Seedance 2.5 at 1080p, Veo 3.1 Fast, Nano Banana Pro or Grok Imagine Video, or when you want failed and refused jobs not to cost anything. Each job goes to the lowest-cost route for that model and setting and moves to another route if that one fails.

Switching from Runware

Create a key on the sign-up page, add credit, and send the job to Revana instead. The model name and the input fields are in the docs; for Seedance 2.5 at 1080p the call is:

curl https://api.revana.si/v1/generations \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $REVANA_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "seedance-2.5",
    "input": {
      "prompt": "A barista pours latte art in slow motion, morning light through the café window.",
      "resolution": "1080p",
      "duration": 10,
      "aspect_ratio": "16:9"
    },
    "max_cost_usd": 6
  }'

The response carries a job id; poll it, or pass a webhook, and the finished file's link comes back with cost_usd, the exact amount charged. Agents can make the same call through the MCP server, and the model catalogue lists every model and setting.

How we compared

Runware's figures are from the pricing data on each model's page, such as Seedance 2.5, Veo 3.1 and Nano Banana Pro, read on 28 October 2026. Seedance 2.5 is priced by tokens and converted at width times height times 24 frames over 1,024 tokens a second. Runware's Veo 3.1 Lite price includes sound and is compared with Revana's Lite price. Card fees, top-up fees and volume discounts are left out on both sides. The raw numbers, each with the date it was checked, are in market-prices.json.